Defunding Hate

Some 35 years after Roe vs. Wade women are still the victims of religious ideology embedded in government, and special interest who use this controversy to keep the time and energy of the American people focused on an issue that divides them, instead of issues that might unite them.

Despite it being the 21st century, the United States being a nonsectarian nation, ignoring the 14th amendment, Equal Protection Clause, the fact that 51% of the U.S. population is female, and we have many women’s advocacy organizations, with the law, and the numbers, we are stuck in this endless battle which in Jefferson’s “wide wall of separation between church and state” is really about women’s equality, and women’s civil rights. There is no moral or legal standing for the infringement upon a women’s freedom of choice, self-determination, or access to healthcare or any other services she so chooses, and anything to the contrary is sectarian idiocy and dogma, a failure of both society to act against injustice, and the government to defend its citizens who it is solely beholden to with all the resources available to it.

But still, here we are being confronted by ideologically driven legislators, with beliefs they think they have a right to legally impose on other citizens. It is fundamentalism when you don’t understand that “Freedom of Religion is Freedom from Religion”, the politically ambitious which aren’t ideologically driven at all, they just want the religious base vote, so they will pursue power by suppressing other peoples civil rights without a thought, and the supporting cast of special interest organizations, media, and the pundit / entertainer class. That is where we come to the meat of the newest outrage, FOX Entertainment’s long time talking head, Rush Limbaugh.
Rush Limbaugh has been a provocative and polarizing entertainer for some time now, I guess if you blend in, and aren't controversial then you wouldn’t be successful. He has spent many years narrating his own version of conservative talk radio and cable television and is no stranger to outrageous rants or comments.

So, when women’s healthcare issues began hitting a frenzied state once again fueled by attacks on Planned Parenthood, outrageous republican legislation nationwide, GOP presidential primary campaign rhetoric, along with a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing on the Obama contraceptive coverage rule which featured an all-male panel with no women representatives, the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee's special hearing in response to the GOP’s decision to prevent women from testifying brought us the testimony of an articulate 3rd year Harvard Law school student named Sandra Fluke.

Her well presented testimony was not well received by extreme right wing conservatives, or those that make a living instigating them, so Rush Limbaugh let loose with a rant, to include calling the young lady a “slut” on national television. The private and public backlash from that “Freudian slip” was quick and severe, the President was quick to call the young lady in support of her courage, and to grab the political high ground, Rush was unapologetic expanding on some of his claims, but as sponsors pulled out from his show, as the FOX network and he were beginning to see the economic impact, he did offer a strained apology, but those are superficial and meaningless, and Ms. Fluke rejected it. As of this writing twenty advertising sponsors have pulled out of his show, and several radio stations have dropped his show.

This women’s rights issue specifically targets the 99% demographic making it a 99% issue violating Human, Civil, and Equal Rights. It is about settled federal law, the protection of women, and enforcement against individuals, groups, organizations, corporations, and governing bodies who attempt to suppress, inhibit, or deny any woman healthcare, or her personal freedom of religion, which is the freedom of self-determination. This is about the over reach of certain minority religious doctrine into the machine of government which has brought injustice to a broad class of citizens that represent fifty one percent of the population of the United States, and this is about misdirection because nothing is allowed to be sustained for decades, to ebb and flow by accident. This is a diversion, and it’s delaying progress on many of the other issues that Americans should be up in arms over and addressing.

But, as we see the drag of these issues on women, on all of us, we should seize the momentum, and mobilize as never before. We are many, and in a consumer society, we should continue to make our feelings and demands known economically. If it is money that drives their world, then we should deprive them of it, through economic protest we should “Defund the Hate”. Use your power of the purse to compel change, as well as your voice, vote, and pen. The Limbaugh case is one example and I would boycott the products, services, and ideas of every advertiser of his show after calling them, every pundit /politician, every organization, charity, corporation, and every state that backs these policies of inequality. This is the 21st century, we need to move deliberately and in mass with actions that will finally put this issue to rest.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

Credo Petition to Limbaugh Advertisers

Please sign the Credo Petition to the remaining Rush Limbaugh advertisers. All ready 180 advertisers have dumped the show, this is just another avenue for further economic protest.

Where in the Constitution do

Where in the Constitution do you find the words "separation between church and state?" Just curious if you know. Furthermore, do you understand what Jefferson meant when he said it? Are you aware that he meant that government(s)/majorities do not have the constitutional authority to dictate to the church what their doctrine ought to be. It had nothing to do with Christians not being involved in politics as you seem to insinuate.

Jeffersons "Seperation of Church and State"

I didn't cite the constitution as being the source of Jefferson's words, and it wasn't, but those were his words, and they were pivotal in the formation of many of our laws and liberties, and have been pivotal in the writing of the Bill of Rights, Amendments to the Constitution, and many State and Supreme Court cases. Jefferson would say we are a nonsectarian Nation, a melting pot, how could one mans religion or belief system take either standing or submit to another's, that was his, and the founding fathers stance. Freedom of religion, is Freedom of Religions, and Freedom from Religion. The Law must allow the independence of self-determination, it must enforce it, or tyranny will rule as history has well documented.
Thank you for your comment, I only wish for all people to experience freedom from religious persecution by religious zealots, who try to impose their own beliefs upon others using temporary political majorities to impose it.
Jefferson and Danbury Baptist Church

I don't understand Anonymous' comment

I do not really see how Anonymous' comment is relevant or even on the topic.  But, I assumed they some how saw it that way.